Trapping Iran with a Tripwire
rudkla - 11. Jun, 14:38
Iran
Sunday, 11. June 2006
Friday, 2. June 2006
The swift-boating of America
rudkla - 2. Jun, 16:17
Thursday, 1. June 2006
Iran lehnt Verhandlungen mit Washington ab
rudkla - 1. Jun, 12:41
Tuesday, 23. May 2006
Danaer-Geschenk?
US-Regierung will Europa unter den Schirm ihres teuren, noch bestenfalls "rudimentären" Raketenabwehrsystems holen, angeblich zum Schutz vor iranischen Langstreckenraketen -- Polen oder die Tschechische Republik sind für die Stationierung von Abfangraketen im Gespräch.
http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/22/22726/1.html Die
http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/22/22726/1.html Die
rudkla - 23. May, 22:55
Saturday, 20. May 2006
Iran's Letter Should Start a Dialogue
rudkla - 20. May, 16:21
Sunday, 7. May 2006
The real reason Iran has been unfairly singled out is because they’ve committed the inexcusable crime of controlling their own resources
rudkla - 7. May, 08:42
Wednesday, 19. April 2006
Descent into Anger and Despair
rudkla - 19. Apr, 15:20
Tuesday, 18. April 2006
Don’t Bomb Iran
The wages of consensus
CounterPunch
by Norman Solomon
04/17/06
In MoveOn's mass email letter, the only reference to a non-nuclear attack on Iran came in a solitary sentence without any followup: 'Even a conventional attack would likely be a disaster.' ... 'Likely' be a disaster? Is there any U.S. military attack on Iran that plausibly would not be a disaster? ... Will those who put out MoveOn's email alerts and green light its advertising campaigns eventually use some of the group's resources to promote opposition to any and all bombing of Iran? It's probably a matter of time -- but every day of holding back from engaging in solid unambiguous opposition to any military attack on Iran is a day lost that can never be regained. ... There are significant efforts underway to utilize the Internet as part of efforts to prevent any attack on Iran. For example, as part of broader organizing campaigns, a coalition of groups has begun a Don’t Attack Iran petition. And TrueMajority is promoting an equally valuable Don’t Bomb Iran petition...
http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon04172006.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
CounterPunch
by Norman Solomon
04/17/06
In MoveOn's mass email letter, the only reference to a non-nuclear attack on Iran came in a solitary sentence without any followup: 'Even a conventional attack would likely be a disaster.' ... 'Likely' be a disaster? Is there any U.S. military attack on Iran that plausibly would not be a disaster? ... Will those who put out MoveOn's email alerts and green light its advertising campaigns eventually use some of the group's resources to promote opposition to any and all bombing of Iran? It's probably a matter of time -- but every day of holding back from engaging in solid unambiguous opposition to any military attack on Iran is a day lost that can never be regained. ... There are significant efforts underway to utilize the Internet as part of efforts to prevent any attack on Iran. For example, as part of broader organizing campaigns, a coalition of groups has begun a Don’t Attack Iran petition. And TrueMajority is promoting an equally valuable Don’t Bomb Iran petition...
http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon04172006.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
rudkla - 18. Apr, 15:56
